Your ad could be here - Reach CV/ML engineers

Contact for advertising

Interested in

advertising?

Contact us
Bounding BoxesChoosing AugmentationsImage Classification3D AugmentationsKeypointsOptimizing SpeedSemantic SegmentationVideo
Lib Comparison
FAQ
API Reference

Optimizing Augmentation Pipelines for Speed 🔗

Slow augmentation pipelines can leave your expensive GPUs waiting for data, becoming a significant bottleneck in your training loop. This guide covers key strategies to maximize the throughput of your Albumentations pipelines.

(For advice on selecting augmentations that improve model generalization, see the Choosing Augmentations guide.)

Performance Optimization Strategies 🔗

1. Prefer uint8 Images 🔗

Albumentations supports both uint8 (0-255) and float32 ( 0.0-1.0) image formats. While float32 might seem necessary for normalized inputs later, many underlying OpenCV functions used by Albumentations are optimized for uint8.

  • Important Note on float32: If you provide float32 images, Albumentations expects them to be in the range [0.0, 1.0]. Values outside this range will be clipped. Ensure your float images are scaled appropriately before passing them to the pipeline if they are not already in the [0.0, 1.0] range.
  • Recommendation: Perform as much of your augmentation pipeline as possible using uint8 images. Operations are often faster or at least the same speed compared to float32. You can apply A.Normalize directly to uint8 images; it handles the conversion to float and scaling correctly based on the max_pixel_value (which defaults to 255 for uint8).

2. Crop Early, Crop First 🔗

Applying augmentations to smaller images is significantly faster. If your workflow involves cropping the image (e.g., to a fixed input size for your model), do it as early as possible in the pipeline.

  • Example: Cropping an image from 1024x1024 down to 256x256 reduces the number of pixels by a factor of ( (1024 \times 1024) / (256 \times 256) = 16 ). Subsequent augmentations in the pipeline only need to process 1/16th of the original data, leading to significant speedups.
  • Recommendation: Place transforms like CenterCrop, RandomCrop, or especially RandomResizedCrop at the beginning of your Compose block. This drastically reduces the number of pixels processed by subsequent augmentations.
import albumentations as A
 
# Good: Crop first
fast_pipeline = A.Compose([
    A.RandomResizedCrop(height=224, width=224, scale=(0.8, 1.0), p=1.0),
    A.HorizontalFlip(p=0.5),
    A.RandomBrightnessContrast(p=0.2),
    # ... other transforms on 224x224 image ...
    A.Normalize(mean=(0.485, 0.456, 0.406), std=(0.229, 0.224, 0.225)),
])
 
# Bad: Crop last (much slower)
slow_pipeline = A.Compose([
    A.HorizontalFlip(p=0.5), # Applied to large image
    A.RandomBrightnessContrast(p=0.2), # Applied to large image
    # ... other transforms on large image ...
    A.RandomResizedCrop(height=224, width=224, scale=(0.8, 1.0), p=1.0),
    A.Normalize(mean=(0.485, 0.456, 0.406), std=(0.229, 0.224, 0.225)),
])

3. Combine Transforms Where Possible 🔗

Fewer transforms generally mean less overhead. Look for opportunities to use transforms that combine multiple operations.

Check the documentation for transforms like Affine, and RandomResizedCrop as they often combine multiple geometric actions efficiently.

4. Optimize Image Reading 🔗

While not strictly an Albumentations optimization, the way you read image files from disk significantly impacts overall pipeline speed. Standard PIL (Pillow) is often slower than alternatives.

  • Recommendation: Use libraries optimized for speed, such as OpenCV (cv2.imread) or torchvision.io.read_image. Benchmarks, like the one discussed by Lightly AI, have shown considerable speedups by switching away from PIL for decoding, especially for JPEG images which decode much faster than PNG.

    Detailed benchmarks comparing various image reading libraries (including OpenCV, PIL, Pillow-SIMD, torchvision, TensorFlow I/O, jpeg4py, kornia-rs) can be found in the imread_benchmark repository. See the chart below for an example performance comparison on one platform:

    Performance Comparison Chart

    Reference: Lightly AI Blog Post on Switching to Albumentations

5. Address Multiprocessing Bottlenecks (OpenCV & PyTorch) 🔗

When using Albumentations within a PyTorch DataLoader with multiple workers (num_workers > 0), you might encounter unexpected slowdowns. This often happens because OpenCV (cv2), the backend for many Albumentations transforms, can try to parallelize its own operations using multiple threads.

When each of your DataLoader workers spawns multiple OpenCV threads, they can contend for CPU resources, leading to overall slower performance than expected.

  • Solution: Force OpenCV to run in single-threaded mode within each worker process. Add this code at the beginning of your training script or within the worker initialization:

    import cv2
cv2.setNumThreads(0)
# Optionally, disable OpenCL if not needed or causing issues
# cv2.ocl.setUseOpenCL(False)

    Setting cv2.setNumThreads(0) prevents OpenCV from creating its own thread pool within each worker, allowing PyTorch's multiprocessing to manage parallelism effectively.

    Further Reading: This issue and solution are also highlighted in the Lightly AI Blog Post.

Where to Go Next? 🔗

After optimizing your pipeline for speed, you might want to: